Archive for February, 2012

Improperly Installed Heating System Kills Elderly Man

Monday, February 27th, 2012

Recently, an elderly man died after inhaling smoke and carbon monoxide at 86 years old. He was found in the bathroom by his daughter, covered in soot. Her grief and horror were boundless when she later discovered that the furnace installed in her father’s home in 2009 was in violation of many state safety codes. The company that installed the heater never received a permit from the city for work, nor was a combustion test run after the heater was installed.

Furthermore, investigators found a pipe too small for the flue and the chimney was clogged with soot. A connector pipe was installed in the incorrect location and placed too close to flammable materials.

In an attempt to make sure that this does not occur again, the family filed a wrongful death lawsuit. As a requirement in the lawsuit, the heater company was expected to produce the results of the combustion test they claimed to have performed; it was never produced. The plaintiff’s attorney tried to settle out of court, but the business refused to settle under any conditions.

The case will go to trial, with a massive amount of evidence from the fire department. The plaintiff is seeking unspecified damages, along with punitive damages for the wrongful death of her father and for violating the consumer protection laws of the state.

At this point, evidence points to the probability that the company that installed the heater was negligent and caused this wrongful death.

When a death occurs, and there is a question of negligence on the part of another person or entity, it is necessary to talk to a professional personal injury lawyer to be guided as to how to proceed. At Abronson Law, we work on a contingent-fee basis. This means that we do not get paid unless we win the case. We are here to help, and welcome you to call us for a free consultation.

Two Men Seriously Hurt in Semi-Trailer Truck Crash

Monday, February 27th, 2012

Recent news reports told of a terrible accident involving two semi-trailer trucks and a red Acura. The car was hit and then run over; the driver and the passenger in the Acura were seriously injured.

The police report indicates that the Acura and both of the semi-trailer trucks were traveling north when the driver of the Acura decided to change lanes. Upon changing lanes, the Acura clipped one truck and spun out of control into the lane of the second truck, which ran over the Acura.

While the two male passengers sustained serious injuries, the drivers of the two semis escaped unscathed.

A police report stated that the Acura had been cut in two parts, which resulted in the ejection of one passenger and the entrapment of the other in the wreckage of the car. The driver and the passenger were transported and treated at a local hospital.

Proving who was at fault in a car accident demands a complete understanding of motor vehicle laws, engineering principles, accident reconstruction and a dedication to uncovering all of the important facts surrounding a crash.

In many instances, the reasoning is obvious. But in other cases, its necessary for a California personal injury attorney to dissect the events of the accident and employ advocacy tactics to realize the best possible result.

Any accident similar to the case just described requires the right attorney with the proper amount of training and experience to handle a California personal injury claim. If you happen to find yourself in a situation where fault in an accident is unclear, Abronson Law Offices can help. We have experienced attorneys that look out for clients’ best interests and the best possible income after enduring a traumatic accident.

Abronson Law Offices Highlights Important Steps to Take During Winter Driving

Friday, February 24th, 2012

Although this has been a dry winter, we will likely still see some rain — as well as ice and snow in the mountains — during February and early March. Drivers should take proper precautions in order to keep their own and others’ vehicles safe. To do so, it’s crucial also to keep abreast of changing updates as conditions get worse during the course of a day.

When traveling this winter in less-than-favorable conditions, be sure to get plenty of rest before setting out. Make sure you have a full tank of gas and that your windshield wipers have recently been replaced.

In addition, for those that frequently drive over windy roads, keep in mind that bridges that aren’t exposed to the sun because they are blocked by redwood or other types of trees can get very slippery in the rain.

Be sure to allow extra time to drive to your destination, and pay close attention when doing things like accelerating, turning, and braking. Fast driving and quickly changing lanes can make driving especially dangerous during the winter. Remember that serious and even fatal accidents can occur when you’re not careful in a winter storm.

Cellphone Use is not the Only Reason for Driving Distracted

Friday, February 24th, 2012

Driving while distracted is a major issue today with the abundance of devices being used by people while they drive. One simply cannot text, talk on a cell phone, eat, drink, shave or change clothing — and try to drive successfully at the same time.

In the San Francisco Bay Area, this type of behavior can typically be seen during the morning commute on highway 101, 280 or 85.

While cellphone use is the leading cause of fatal accidents, there is also texting while driving, eating, drinking, talking to other passengers, watching the scenery, programming a GPS system, picking things up off the floor, changing discs in the mp3 player and so on. When distracted driving is the cause, it is an issue that calls for changing driver behavior and perceptions; the perception that it is alright to do anything more than focusing on the road.

Anyone finding themselves involved in an accident where the other driver was driving while distracted has the right to contact a qualified personal injury lawyer to inquire about what legal options are open to them. If they were injured, they may be able to seek compensation for those injuries, including medical bills, lost wages and other financial — as well  as personal — hardships that resulted from the accident.

$1.5 Million Awarded in Business Dispute

Friday, February 24th, 2012

The owner of testing lab, Universal Oral Fluid Laboratory LLC, William Hughes, was ordered to pay $1.5 million to Michelle McEldowney. Hughes and McEldowney were partners in the company until they had a disagreement in 2010, according to court records.

The panel ordered Hughes to give McEldowney $1.4 million in damages for breach of contract, along with another $110,000 for lost wages.

Pittsburgh attorney David Strassburger claimed that McEldowney is Hughes’ niece. McEldowney and Hughes created a partnership in 2009 to take advantage of the profitable saliva-testing field for medical diagnosis, according to the suit. Under the terms of the agreement, McEldowney’s task was to open the company, as well as take care of its financial records.

McEldowney had a feeling that Hughes was operating a phony corporation and was being financed by a silent partner who had a lifetime ban from submitting bills to Medicare following a conviction for fraud, according to court records. McEldowney claimed that her criticism of the “seed money” given by the investor resulted in her being fired by Hughes.

Additionally, she questioned Hughes’ practice of paying consulting fees to physicians who referred tests to the laboratories, which is against state and federal anti-kickback laws, court records show.

The pair signed an agreement in 2001, that Hughes would buy out McEldowney by reimbursing her $10 for every saliva test done by the company over the next five years. In exchange, McEldowney said she would give up any share of the business. However, Hughes did not honor the agreement, and that is the reason that the case ended up in court.

Business disputes can be costly when one party does not uphold his end of a contract. Business dispute cases do not always have to end up being solved in court. We are happy to offer a free initial consultation to discuss your business litigation needs and will do our best to resolve disputes in an informal fashion outside the courtroom.

 

Man Awarded $1.5M for Country Club fall – New Jersey

Thursday, February 23rd, 2012

Floyd Romyns, 44, was awarded $1.5 million after incurring a serious head injury when he fell retrieving a golf ball from a sand trap on the 15th hole at the Newton Country Club in Morris County, New Jersey.

In a 5-1 vote, the civil jury decided that All Turf Inc. of Long Valley, New Jersey, was careless for not getting rid of the wood edging from around the sand trap on the 15th hole of the country club. Romyns was standing in the vicinity of a trap, close to the edge, when the sod just gave way. According to court records, this resulted in his falling into the trap and striking his neck and head on the wood collar, or edging, that formed the border of the trap.

The finding of the jury in the personal injury case was that Romyns was not comparatively negligent. As noted in the official records of the court, the jury found $1.5 million in compensatory damages for his pain, suffering, physical and mental impairment and loss of the enjoyment of life.

As shown in court records, Romyns has been subjected to several surgeries, including spinal operations which required fusions at six levels of cervical and thoracic spine, as well as vocational rehab.

If you or a loved one finds yourself in a similar situation after being injured on pubic (or private) property, call us for a free consultation; we may be able to recover compensation to cover hospital bills and other losses due to an inability to work.

Personal Injury Case a Result of a Retirement Home Accident

Thursday, February 23rd, 2012

The document production request of the plaintiff was responded to by one of the three defendants in the personal injury case in Madison County.

Judith Simmons is the plaintiff in a personal injury lawsuit claiming that she stepped through a door and fell into a 4′ deep hole — injuring both her legs at a retirement home in Madison County, IA.

The charges were brought against three defendants, including Maul Excavating, Kane Mechanical and Faith Countryside Homes.

The plaintiff states that proper precautions were not taken, and that warnings regarding the hazard that they had created should have been posted. Complaints include that they failed to block the entry door — or to give any indication that a hazard was present. As a result, she suffered permanent pain, mental anguish, disability and disfigurement. In addition, her injuries are now preventing her from performing at work resulting in a loss of past, present, and future wages. She is also  liable for a large amount of money due to hospital and medical expenses; Simmons is asking for $75,000.

According to the three defendants, Simmons should have been careful of the trench and hole and believe that her injuries are her own fault.

At Abronson Law,  cases are handled on a contingent fee basis. This means that our office is paid only at the end of the case — and only if we have succeeded in recovering money for a client. In other words, if we do not recover any funds, there is no fee.

If you feel that you have been injured due to others’ negligence, please call us for a free consultation.

-Abronson Law

Couple Claims Yamaha ATV Design Caused Crash, Injury

Thursday, February 23rd, 2012

In March 2009, Laurie Perry was operating a 2008 Yamaha Rhino 700 ATV that she had purchased from a Victoria dealership when it rolled over, resulting in serious injuries to her left hand and body.

Laurie and her husband, Drew Perry, sued Yamaha Motor Corp. U.S.A., claiming that the rollover was the result of negligence on behalf of Yamaha. They stated that the company knew the Rhino was defectively designed, manufactured and/or marketed to people likely to use the product for its intended purpose.

“The defendants had a duty to warn the user of the defective design,” stated counsel for the Perrys.

The personal injury case was first filed in federal court in Victoria in August 2009, but was then transferred to federal court in Louisville, Ky., where the defendants already have a pending multi-district case pertaining to their Rhino all-terrain vehicles.

The case was sent back to the Victoria court in December.

In a formal response filed with the courts in September 2009, Yamaha denied the allegations against them, claiming Laurie Perry was negligent in the operation of the Rhino.

Yamaha does not comment on ongoing litigation, but has stated,  ”More than 99 percent of Rhino owners have operated their vehicles safely and responsibly over millions of hours of use. We stand firmly behind the Rhino as a safe and useful off-road vehicle and will vigorously defend the product.”

If you, or someone that you know has been injured as a result of what may be a product defect, you may be entitled to receiving compensation. Although not all accidents are the fault of the manufacturer, oftentimes its worth looking into since the injured will likely incur financial strain from hospital bills, time away from work and ongoing therapy.

In cases such as these, we are happy to discuss your options and whether the case can be resolved outside of court.

Toyo Tire Recalls 69,000 Tires for Potential Tire Failure

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012

In a news statement released on February 11, Cypress, CA-based tire company Toyo Tire USA recalled approximately 69,000 tires because of tire rim kinks that have the potential of causing cracking and tire failure.

According to Toyo, it was the company’s model Toyo Extensa A/S that was recalled. These tires were distributed across the U.S. from the 4th quarter of 2009 until the 4th quarter of 2010.

If you believe you have purchased some of these tires, just check the sidewalls to verify the information. Toyo tires made in the Georgia plant will bear the words “Made in USA” along with an ID Number whose last 4 digits will fall between the numbers: 3809 and 4410.

Customers who have purchased these recalled tires can get free replacements.

There are several ways to get additional information. You can visit the website: (www.toyotires.com/recall-campaign). You could also call the toll free number: 800-442-8696.

Legal Business Disputes

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012

If you’re a business owner, no matter how large or how small your company is, chances are that you will run into a business dispute at one point or another.

Regardless of the type of dispute, you must keep your business running. For this reason, you are wise to hire experts to settle matters promptly.

Support For Your Case

Before engaging a lawyer, be sure you understand the terms of business that you feel you must legally dispute. Remember to always read contracts and agreements carefully before signing. If you don’t understand something, ask about it. Think about the agreement and determine whether or not you might negotiate or amend some parts of it. Be sure to keep copies of invoices and agreements, as well as payment agreements for your reference in the future.

Once you have isolated the particular problem, keep an open mind and figure out what can be accomplished by working together.

Ways That Abronson Law Can Help You

As your business legal dispute progresses, we will be able to assist and advise you every step of the way. We can solve your disputes in a manner that suits the needs of your business.

We generally handle issues quickly and efficiently; our No. 1 goal is to resolve disputes in an informal fashion outside the courtroom. Times are tough, and legal fees can be a very unwelcome and costly expense. This is why all of our work is done on a contingent-fee basis.

What is my next step? 

Contact our office for a free consultation: Abronson Law Offices: (408) 687-9155 Learn more about our business litigation practice by visiting: http://redhouselawyer.com/services_page.php?id=4&keywords=Business_Litigation